<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Neadreport - Latest Comments in Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://geakz.disqus.com/</link><description>Brain Dump. Join in!</description><atom:link href="https://geakz.disqus.com/top_ten_reason8217s_8220top_10_lists8221_suck/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:16:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-2142013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Furious, I like your honesty!  Thanks for dropping in again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeadReport</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:16:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-2138108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol. Guilty of #3 myself. I'm a horrible writer so I rely on things like Top X lists to relay my otherwise undecipherable messages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank N. Stein</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1920140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Snackster!  Thanks for dropping a comment in the bucket.  I like the Top 2 idea.  Maybe a top 1 list?  Minimalism at its best.  I thought Letterman invented the top 10 list.  But I could be wrong.  Blog on!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeadReport</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1906201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like "Top 2" lists.  It is more of a couplet than a real list, and indecisive people to have an inner wrestling match.  You just don't get that with a top 10 list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But seriously, because of Letterman, people expect the #1 in the list to be sort of lame and the #2 or #3 really being the best reason&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheSnackHound</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1860006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Top 3 list?  Do I smell... PATENT??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeadReport</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:40:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1859914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do like me a good Top 10 list and they're harder to write well than most people think. It's because of #5. But I guess a Top 3 List doesn't sound so enticing, does it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How's that patent coming along?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:29:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1859295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Curtis and Jaffer.  Sorry for the delay in my response...Disqus is now blocked at work, so I can't catch up on replies until I'm home.&lt;br&gt;I think Jaffer is in a time continuum warp with his numbering.  Tis true, Jaffer and I are now inseparable due to comment organizational standards I imposed upon myself at Kathy's blog.  Curtis, thanks for the words.  I hope you look at Top 10 Lists in a different light now. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeadReport</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1835582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats a good Top Ten List there! :) I like #3 and use it alot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curtis </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten Reason&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Top 10 Lists&amp;#8221; Suck.</title><link>http://www.geakz.com/2008/08/25/top-ten-reasons-top-10-lists-suck/#comment-1826766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;5.) I love top ten lists - they are fun to read. Research says so !&lt;br&gt;4.) I like five-point commenting as well - there are 5 other reasons why get right to the point.&lt;br&gt;3.) You and I became friends by fighting over rights to the 5 point commenting on Kathy's blog.&lt;br&gt;4.) You won.&lt;br&gt;5.)I forgot what in order this list was supposed to start.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaffer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>